What certifications does an EV charger need?
Guide, EV charger
An electric vehicle charger is not a single-certification product: it is an assembly that crosses several regulatory frameworks at once. Electrical safety, electromagnetic compatibility, embedded radio, metering of billed energy, hazardous substances and cybersecurity each fall under a distinct directive or standard. This page is an entry point: it maps the compliance stack, points to the detailed guide for each building block, and offers a decision table plus a checklist. For the technical deep coverage of the protocols (IEC 61851 modes, ISO 15118 Plug and Charge, OCPP back-office), follow the dedicated EV charging guide.
The compliance stack at a glance
Section titled “The compliance stack at a glance”A charger combines mandatory regulatory frameworks and contractual industry conformities. The table below summarises who requires what, and which in-depth guide to head to.
| Building block | Framework | Mandatory? | Guide to read |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU electrical safety | LVD 2014/35/EU | Yes (EU) | Low Voltage Directive |
| EU EMC | EMC Directive 2014/30/EU | Yes (EU) | EMC Directive |
| Embedded radio | RED 2014/53/EU | If radio present | RED checklist |
| Energy metering | MID 2014/32/EU | If billed per kWh | Measuring Instruments MID |
| Hazardous substances | RoHS 2011/65/EU | Yes (EU) | RoHS |
| Electronic waste | WEEE 2012/19/EU | Yes (EU) | WEEE |
| North America safety | UL 2202, UL 2231, UL 2594 | Yes (US, CA) | UL section below |
| Product cybersecurity | CRA (EU) 2024/2847 | General from late 2027 | Cyber Resilience Act |
| Industrial cybersecurity | IEC 62443 | Contractual | IEC 62443 |
| Charging protocols | IEC 61851, ISO 15118, OCPP | Contractual | EV charging IEC 61851 |
The overall logic: regulatory conformity (CE, UL, MID) governs market placement; industry conformity (OCPP, ISO 15118, CharIN) governs access to operator and distribution grid tenders.
CE marking: three or four directives stacked
Section titled “CE marking: three or four directives stacked”CE marking for a European charger is not a single act. It attests conformity to every applicable directive, and a typical charger accumulates several.
Electrical safety (LVD)
Section titled “Electrical safety (LVD)”The LVD 2014/35/EU covers electrical safety for equipment rated between 50 and 1000 V AC, or 75 and 1500 V DC. A public AC charger at 400 V three-phase, a high-voltage DC fast charger: all fall in scope. Relevant harmonised standards include the IEC 61851-1 series for conductive charging systems, and IEC 62368-1 for power and electronics sub-assemblies. The assessment addresses protection against electric shock, heating, clearance and creepage distances, and protective coordination.
Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)
Section titled “Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)”The EMC Directive 2014/30/EU requires that the charger neither emit excessive disturbance nor be vulnerable to its electromagnetic environment. DC fast chargers, with their high-frequency switched power converters, are significant emitters: conducted and radiated emission tests, together with immunity tests (electrostatic discharge, fast transients, voltage dips) are decisive. See our PCB and EMC guide for upstream design.
Embedded radio (RED)
Section titled “Embedded radio (RED)”As soon as a radio module is present (Wi-Fi for supervision, a cellular modem for the back-office, an RFID or NFC reader for user identification), the RED 2014/53/EU replaces LVD and EMC for the radio part and adds the efficient-use-of-spectrum requirement. Standards EN 300 328 (2.4 GHz), EN 301 489 (radio EMC) and the EN 301 908 series (cellular) are typically invoked. The cybersecurity articles 3.3(d) to 3.3(f) have applied since August 2025. Our RED checklist details the route.
Substances and end of life (RoHS, WEEE)
Section titled “Substances and end of life (RoHS, WEEE)”The RoHS 2011/65/EU restricts lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium and brominated flame retardants; its compliance is a condition of CE marking. The WEEE 2012/19/EU imposes end-of-life collection and recycling obligations. Both apply to the charger as electrical and electronic equipment.
The MID: billing energy per kWh
Section titled “The MID: billing energy per kWh”This is the most often underestimated building block. As soon as the charger forms the basis of a commercial transaction billed on the energy actually delivered to the end customer, the active energy meter falling under annex MI-003 of the MID 2014/32/EU must be assessed by a notified body.
| Use case | MID applicable? |
|---|---|
| Private residential charger (no third-party billing) | No |
| Public charger billed per session or per minute | Generally no |
| Public charger billed per kWh delivered | Yes, MI-003 |
| Workplace charger with per-kWh recharge to staff | Yes, MI-003 |
In Germany, the Eichrecht (legal metrology law) adds transparency and traceability requirements for measurement data beyond the MID. For the assessment modules in detail, see the Measuring Instruments MID guide.
North America: UL listing and NRTL
Section titled “North America: UL listing and NRTL”In the United States and Canada, the route is not self-declaration but third-party certification by an accredited NRTL laboratory (Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory), such as UL, Intertek or CSA. The base standards are:
| Standard | Scope |
|---|---|
| UL 2594 | AC charging equipment (AC EVSE) |
| UL 2202 | DC charging equipment (DC EVSE) |
| UL 2231 | Personnel protection for EV supply circuits (parts 1 and 2) |
| UL 2251 | Plugs, receptacles and couplers for electric vehicles |
For the embedded radio, FCC equipment authorisation (Part 15) is added through an FCC ID, with ISED approval on the Canadian side. Commercial metrology under NIST Handbook 44 and the California Type Evaluation Program (CTEP) applies to chargers billed per kWh in the United States, the functional equivalent of the European MID. The difference in model (CE self-declaration versus UL third-party certification) is set out in our CE versus FCC and EMC comparison.
Cybersecurity: from radio module to system
Section titled “Cybersecurity: from radio module to system”A connected charger is a target. Three frameworks overlap.
Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)
Section titled “Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)”The CRA regulation (EU) 2024/2847 imposes essential cybersecurity requirements on any product with digital elements, with vulnerability management across the life cycle and a reporting obligation. General application falls in December 2027. A charger connected to the back-office is clearly in scope. See the Cyber Resilience Act guide.
RED articles 3.3(d) to 3.3(f)
Section titled “RED articles 3.3(d) to 3.3(f)”For the radio module, the RED has imposed, since August 2025, network protection, protection of personal data, and fraud protection. These requirements are distinct from those of the CRA but address the same product.
IEC 62443 and OCPP
Section titled “IEC 62443 and OCPP”On the industrial architecture side, IEC 62443 structures the security of control and automation systems, relevant when the charger integrates into a supervision infrastructure. On the protocol side, OCPP 2.0.1 Security Profile 2 or 3 imposes TLS, even mutual TLS with client certificates, on the back-office link. See IEC 62443.
Functional safety and quality
Section titled “Functional safety and quality”For high-power DC chargers, the functional safety of critical functions (emergency disconnection, insulation fault detection, thermal management) may fall under IEC 61508, the generic functional-safety standard for electrical, electronic and programmable systems. The target safety integrity level (SIL) is determined by risk analysis. See the SIL functional safety IEC 61508 guide and ISO 14971 risk management for the method.
Procedure: sequencing a charger certification
Section titled “Procedure: sequencing a charger certification”- Classify the product. AC or DC charger? Embedded radio? Per-kWh billing? Target markets (EU, North America, other)? Each answer activates a building block of the stack.
- Scope the applicable standards. Draw up the list of directives and standards from the decision table below.
- Design for compliance. Build EMC and safety into the PCB and power converter design from the start; plan the cybersecurity architecture.
- Write the technical file. See technical file contents and the test plan template.
- Run the tests. LVD, EMC, RED at an accredited laboratory; CharIN testivals for interoperability; OCPP certification.
- Engage the notified body for the MID (annex MI-003) and, where relevant, certain RED modules.
- Establish conformity and affix the mark. Draft the EU declaration of conformity and affix CE marking; obtain UL listing and the FCC ID for North America.
Decision table: which block for which charger
Section titled “Decision table: which block for which charger”| If your charger... | Then you need... |
|---|---|
| Is sold in the EU | LVD, EMC, RoHS, WEEE, EU declaration of conformity |
| Embeds Wi-Fi, cellular or RFID | RED (replaces LVD and EMC for the radio) plus RED cybersecurity |
| Bills energy per kWh in the EU | MID annex MI-003 via a notified body |
| Is sold in the US or Canada | UL 2202 or UL 2594 listing by an NRTL, FCC ID if radio |
| Is connected to a back-office | CRA, OCPP with a security profile, possibly IEC 62443 |
| Supports Plug and Charge | ISO 15118-2 and V2G PKI, CharIN testival |
| Is a high-power DC charger | IEC 61851-23, IEC 61508 functional safety per analysis |
Common pitfalls
Section titled “Common pitfalls”| Pitfall | Consequence | Countermeasure |
|---|---|---|
| Forgetting the MID on a per-kWh charger | Charger cannot be sold for regulated billing | Classify the use case at scoping; engage a notified body early |
| Treating radio under EMC instead of RED | Wrong framework, retesting, delay | Check for any radio module from the design stage |
| Deferring cybersecurity to the end | Costly redesign for the CRA and RED 3.3 | Build the security architecture in from the start |
| Confusing OCPP conformity with CE marking | Operator tender rejection | Treat OCPP and ISO 15118 as distinct contractual requirements |
| Neglecting DC converter emission tests | EMC failure at the laboratory | Design filtering and shielding early, see PCB and EMC guide |
| Assuming UL listing equals CE marking | Non-conformity on one of the two markets | Run both routes in parallel from the start |
Further reading
Section titled “Further reading”- EV charging: IEC 61851, ISO 15118 and OCPP
- MID: measuring instruments
- RED checklist
- Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)
- EMC Directive 2014/30
- Getting started with certification
Sources and references
Section titled “Sources and references”Sources & references
- Directive 2014/35/EU (Low Voltage Directive, LVD) , EUR-Lex eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32014L0035
- Directive 2014/30/EU (Electromagnetic Compatibility) , EUR-Lex eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32014L0030
- Directive 2014/53/EU (Radio Equipment Directive, RED) , EUR-Lex eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32014L0053
- Directive 2014/32/EU (Measuring Instruments Directive, MID) , EUR-Lex eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32014L0032
- Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 (Cyber Resilience Act) , EUR-Lex eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32024R2847
- IEC 61851-1 Electric vehicle conductive charging system , IEC webstore.iec.ch/publication/33644
- UL 2594 Standard for Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment , UL Standards www.shopulstandards.com/ProductDetail.aspx?productId=UL2594
- IEC 62443 Security for industrial automation and control systems , IEC webstore.iec.ch/publication/7029