Deutsche Telekom IoT: acceptance, nuSIM and Cloud of Things
Guide · Deutsche Telekom IoT
Deutsche Telekom (DT) is one of the European telecom operators most engaged in cellular IoT, with a strategy combining a multi-country footprint, a proprietary acceptance programme, the Cloud of Things application platform, and a specific innovation: nuSIM, its integrated SIM (iSIM) hosted inside the cellular SoC. For a manufacturer aiming at the European market with a cellular product, 3GPP conformance through GCF is not enough: passing DT IoT acceptance conditions listing in the DT certified hardware catalogue and eligibility for carrier offers. This page describes the DT footprint relative to T-Mobile US, the DT IoT acceptance programme, the nuSIM versus SGP.32 eUICC trade-off, the positioning of Cloud of Things, cellular module qualification, the technologies covered, and the pitfalls that delay listing.
Deutsche Telekom footprint and demarcation from T-Mobile US
Section titled “Deutsche Telekom footprint and demarcation from T-Mobile US”The Deutsche Telekom group operates mobile networks in several European countries under distinct brand names. T-Mobile US, a separately listed company in which DT holds a majority stake, operates as an independent entity for certification matters and must be addressed in a separate dossier.
| Country | Brand | Network | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | Telekom Deutschland | 2G (switch-off announced for 30 June 2028), LTE, LTE-M, NB-IoT, 5G NR | Primary market, programme reference |
| Austria | Magenta Telekom | LTE, 5G NR; NB-IoT and LTE-M depending on offer | DT group subsidiary, own APNs |
| Czech Republic | T-Mobile CZ | LTE, 5G NR; NB-IoT and LTE-M depending on offer | DT group subsidiary |
| Hungary | Magyar Telekom | LTE, 5G NR; NB-IoT and LTE-M depending on offer | DT group subsidiary |
| Greece | Cosmote (OTE subsidiary) | LTE, 5G NR; NB-IoT and LTE-M depending on offer | DT group subsidiary, distinct Cosmote scope |
| Poland | T-Mobile Polska | LTE, 5G NR; NB-IoT and LTE-M depending on offer | DT group subsidiary |
| Slovakia | Slovak Telekom | LTE, 5G NR; NB-IoT and LTE-M depending on offer | DT group subsidiary |
| Croatia | Hrvatski Telekom | LTE, 5G NR; NB-IoT and LTE-M depending on offer | DT group subsidiary |
| United States | T-Mobile US | LTE, 5G NR, n41/n71 bands | Separate device programme |
NB-IoT and LTE-M availability is checked market by market, for instance through the IoT Solution Optimizer, DT's online tool for modelling an NB-IoT or LTE-M design on the group's networks.
For European manufacturers, the key point is that DT IoT certification does not open T-Mobile US. The US programme is independent, aligned with PTCRB and its own requirements. A product targeting both geographies must plan two distinct acceptance dossiers.
Within the European DT footprint, subsidiaries share a common technical structure but retain local APN policies, IMSI numbering plans and roaming agreements. A module accepted in Germany is not automatically testable without complementary verifications in the Czech Republic or Greece, particularly on NB-IoT chains.
The DT IoT acceptance programme, scope
Section titled “The DT IoT acceptance programme, scope”The DT IoT acceptance programme rests on two foundations: 3GPP conformance via GCF or PTCRB depending on the module, and a DT-specific test plan covering interactions with its networks and its provisioning systems.
Comparison with PTCRB and GCF
Section titled “Comparison with PTCRB and GCF”| Criterion | PTCRB / GCF | DT IoT acceptance |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Cross-carrier 3GPP radio conformance | Deutsche Telekom IoT proprietary programme |
| Reference | 3GPP TS 36.521, TS 38.521 | Superset: 3GPP baseline + DT network tests, nuSIM/eUICC, APNs, intra-group roaming |
| Scope | Generic radio conformance | DT network interoperability, security, device management, no harm to network (GSMA TS.34) |
| Granted by | PTCRB (CTIA) and GCF schemes | Deutsche Telekom IoT, acceptance team |
| Identifier | PTCRB or GCF certification | Listing in the DT certified hardware catalogue |
| Required for DT catalogue eligibility | Yes | Yes, in addition to GCF/PTCRB |
PTCRB and GCF are prerequisites but not sufficient. Without valid 3GPP certification, DT does not open the acceptance phase. With PTCRB or GCF only, the product remains functional on the network but is not eligible for DT's turn-key IoT offers, and certain scenarios (nuSIM, intra-DT NB-IoT roaming, Cloud of Things profiles) cannot be validated.
Portals and entry points
Section titled “Portals and entry points”DT IoT exposes several portals depending on the entry angle:
- iot.telekom.com, the DT IoT product portal (connectivity, SIM, platforms);
- DT IoT Hardware Ecosystem (hardware.iot.telekom.com), the certified hardware catalogue and its documentation;
- T IoT Hub, the orchestration portal for multi-platform connectivity and device management;
- IoT Solution Optimizer, the modelling tool for NB-IoT and LTE-M designs on the group's networks;
- the developer documentation (hub.iot.telekom.com), which describes among other things the device certification process.
Opening an acceptance dossier generally goes through a DT IoT commercial contact, with a prior qualification: expected volume, target geography, object type and chosen SIM solution.
Cellular module qualification
Section titled “Cellular module qualification”Deutsche Telekom invests in the certification of cellular chipsets, modems and modules for its IoT catalogue, following a pyramid logic: few chipsets, more modules, many devices. The goals stated in DT's documentation are interoperability with the networks, compliance with 3GPP and Telekom requirements, security, device management and no harm to network (per GSMA TS.34). Certified hardware is listed in the DT IoT Hardware Ecosystem. The process primarily concerns module manufacturers (Quectel, u-blox, Telit Cinterion, Sierra Wireless, Murata, Sequans, Fibocom and others) who wish to list their module as a pre-accepted building block.
Typical steps:
- Technical submission by the module manufacturer: datasheet, GCF report, PTCRB report where applicable, nuSIM support statement where applicable, SGP.32 eUICC support.
- Documentary review: coverage of European DT bands (B1, B3, B7, B8, B20, B28; n1, n28, n78), LTE-M and NB-IoT support where applicable, minimum 3GPP Release.
- Test campaign in a DT-recognised laboratory: network interoperability for DE and a representative subset of subsidiaries, nuSIM behaviour where applicable, eUICC profile handling, NB-IoT in the lab and under partner roaming conditions.
- Validation and listing in the DT certified hardware catalogue.
Once a module is certified, downstream integrators can use it in their products with a faster and cheaper device-level acceptance. The module becomes a pre-validated brick, much like Verizon's AML or other carriers' approved-module lists (see Verizon Open Development for a comparable North American logic).
Note: the DT certified hardware list evolves. Before a project, manufacturers must ask the module supplier for the current DT certification status, not only the GCF status, to avoid surprises at device acceptance.
nuSIM, the Deutsche Telekom iSIM
Section titled “nuSIM, the Deutsche Telekom iSIM”nuSIM is Deutsche Telekom's technical signature in cellular IoT. It is an iSIM in the GSMA sense, that is to say a SIM application hosted directly in a secure zone of the cellular SoC, without a card or a dedicated eUICC chip. It is optimised for NB-IoT and very-low-cost objects, with compact profiles (under 1 KB according to DT).
nuSIM, SGP.32 eUICC and physical SIM compared
Section titled “nuSIM, SGP.32 eUICC and physical SIM compared”| Criterion | Physical SIM | SGP.32 eUICC | nuSIM (DT iSIM) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Form factor | SIM card or MFF2 | Dedicated chip | Secure zone inside the cellular SoC |
| Standard | ETSI TS 102 221 | GSMA SGP.32 | DT proprietary specification (open-source reference Loader) |
| Provisioning | Physical exchange or classical OTA | IoT RSP: SM-DP+, eIM, IPA | Encrypted profile loaded at factory (DT Data Preparator, Loader Application) |
| Operator portability | Possible with a new card | Multi-operator via GSMA profiles | Turn-key DT, limited portability |
| BOM cost | Highest (card + holder) | Mid-range (chip + integration) | Lowest (no external component) |
| Volume target | All volumes | Mid and large IoT volumes | Very large mono-operator DT volumes |
| Expected lifetime | Short to medium | Long (10 years and beyond) | Long, tied to the SoC |
| LPA / IPA | Not applicable | Required on the device | Not applicable (DT-side orchestration) |
The nuSIM commercial model assumes a three-way partnership: the cellular SoC vendor that integrates the nuSIM application, the product manufacturer that selects this SoC and signs a DT IoT connectivity agreement, and Deutsche Telekom which drives provisioning. Current partner SoCs cover several LPWAN and LTE-M vendors (the list evolves, to be checked directly with DT at the start of any project). At MWC 2025, DT presented with Nordic Semiconductor and PSsystec the MECC initiative (Make Everything Cellular Connected): modules with embedded nuSIM, pre-provisioned at the factory and activated on demand.
The main benefit of nuSIM lies in integration cost and the removal of a hardware failure point: no SIM holder, no extra eUICC chip, no re-soldering if a card loosens. For a high-volume product deployed within a single operator ecosystem (DT and its roaming partners), it is economically the most rational option.
The downside is its relative closure: the nuSIM profile is bound to DT and its orchestrator. If commercial strategy shifts (operator change, international distribution outside the DT footprint), portability is less immediate than with a standard SGP.32 eUICC. The decision must therefore be made during commercial scoping, not mid-development.
nuSIM provisioning pitfalls
Section titled “nuSIM provisioning pitfalls”Three recurring pitfalls:
- Misaligned root key between the SoC manufacturing chain and the DT orchestrator: the product ships with a profile that DT does not recognise. Detection is late (first customer activation) and remediation is expensive (RMA or in-field re-flashing).
- Incomplete personalisation at end-of-line test: the nuSIM IMSI or ICCID is not correctly injected into the secure zone, the module attaches but does not authenticate.
- No re-provisioning channel planned in case of error: nuSIM cannot be reconfigured via a standard SM-DP+ flow. Re-provisioning goes through a firmware update or a device management protocol (LwM2M for instance), which must be planned from the design phase.
The nuSIM provisioning flow is scoped with DT upstream of the project; it is a major point of vigilance for first-time submitters.
Cloud of Things, application platform
Section titled “Cloud of Things, application platform”Cloud of Things (CoT) is Deutsche Telekom's application IoT platform, historically built on Cumulocity IoT through a partnership with Software AG; Cumulocity has been an independent company since early 2025, following a management buyout. The DT offer comes as Cloud of Things SMART, ENTERPRISE and PRIVATE. It offers:
- multi-device, multi-vendor fleet management;
- telemetry collection and storage;
- rules, alerts, dashboards;
- firmware OTA campaign management;
- integration with DT IoT connectivity for billing and SIM management.
CoT is not mandatory to use DT IoT connectivity. An object on DT connectivity can integrate with AWS IoT Core, Azure IoT Hub, or a third-party platform without interfering with network acceptance. CoT is positioned as an option in some turn-key plans bundling connectivity + platform + SIM/nuSIM in a single contract.
For a product whose application strategy is already committed to a hyperscaler, CoT is not a blocking matter. For a product in scoping that seeks an integrated partner, CoT and DT connectivity form a quick vertical offer with no multi-vendor contracts.
Cellular technologies covered
Section titled “Cellular technologies covered”DT IoT drives its acceptance on technologies actively listed in the catalogue. Others remain operable on DT networks (because the radio is conformant) but are not commercially promoted.
LTE Cat-M (LTE-M)
Section titled “LTE Cat-M (LTE-M)”LTE-M (Cat-M1, and Cat-M2 in some cases) is DT's preferred LPWAN technology for moderately mobile objects with moderate throughput and potential VoLTE. LTE-M availability is checked market by market across the group's European footprint, for instance through the IoT Solution Optimizer. LTE-M acceptance verifies PSM and eDRX support, RAI (Release Assistance Indication) behaviour and attach with the target IoT APN.
NB-IoT
Section titled “NB-IoT”NB-IoT is the ultra-low-power technology for stationary or barely mobile objects. DT completed with Vodafone, under the GSMA Mobile IoT Initiative, the first international NB-IoT roaming trials in Europe, and remains a driving force on inter-operator NB-IoT roaming agreements. NB-IoT acceptance verifies attach, PLMN-locking support, long-session stability and behaviour during intra-DT roaming (across group subsidiaries). It is also the scenario where pitfalls are most frequent.
LTE Cat-1bis
Section titled “LTE Cat-1bis”Cat-1bis (LTE Cat-1 throughput with a single antenna) is positioned by DT as an alternative to LTE-M where LTE-M coverage is still uneven and where the product needs higher throughput than LTE-M offers. Cat-1bis acceptance highlights the cell edge issue: without antenna diversity, sensitivity is lower, and a product assuming nominal throughput in real conditions can be deeply disappointing. DT recommends real-world testing beyond lab testing for this category.
LTE Cat-4 and above
Section titled “LTE Cat-4 and above”For gateways, POS terminals and high-throughput medical devices, DT acceptance covers LTE Cat-4, Cat-6 and Cat-7+. VoLTE and IMS requirements then become stricter, and integration with Telekom DE voice services may be required for some categories.
DT is rolling out 5G NSA and progressively 5G SA on European commercial bands (mainly n1, n28, n78). 5G NR acceptance for IoT primarily targets gateways, FWA and industrial terminals. For low-bandwidth objects, staying on LTE-M and NB-IoT remains preferable.
2G (GSM) is in progressive retirement across the DT footprint, on a schedule specific to each subsidiary; in Germany, Telekom has announced the complete 2G switch-off for 30 June 2028. A new 2G-only product no longer makes sense on this footprint. Multi-tech modules (for instance 2G + LTE-M) remain useful to ease the transition, but 2G is no longer a commercial argument in any roadmap.
Pan-European roaming and the global T-IoT offer
Section titled “Pan-European roaming and the global T-IoT offer”Beyond the DT footprint, two dimensions deserve attention.
Classic MNO roaming. DT has roaming agreements with most European operators for 2G, 3G (in retirement), 4G LTE and 5G. LTE-M and NB-IoT coverage in roaming is not guaranteed by default, even where LTE is. An international IoT product must clarify the LPWAN coverage country by country with DT IoT.
Global T-IoT offer. Since February 2022, Deutsche Telekom and T-Mobile US jointly market T-IoT, a global enterprise IoT connectivity offer, announced at launch across 383 networks and 188 destinations, managed through the T-Mobile Control Center and DT's M2M Service Portal. It is the commercial vehicle for deployments outside the group's own network footprint (France, Italy, Spain and the UK notably), through the group's roaming agreements. The quality and reach of LPWAN services in roaming vary with the local host operator, which can create asymmetries in the behaviour of the same product across countries.
For manufacturers with broader targets, see also the Verizon Open Development programme for the United States, and the multi-operator logic documented in the certification timeline and certification costs.
eUICC, profiles and orchestration
Section titled “eUICC, profiles and orchestration”For products that do not use nuSIM, DT IoT acceptance enforces current GSMA standards.
- GSMA SGP.22 remains the Consumer RSP standard, used for products with a UI (gateways, M2M terminals with a screen, for instance). DT supports SGP.22 for compatibility but steers new IoT deployments towards SGP.32.
- GSMA SGP.32 is the IoT RSP standard, expected on all new headless products. It introduces the eIM (eSIM IoT Manager) for fleet management without user intervention; the IPA must be correctly implemented on the device side.
- SGP.02 (the historical M2M architecture) is being progressively retired. DT, like the other large operators, steers new products towards SGP.32; SGP.02 retirement schedules are scoped directly with DT.
The LPA or IPA must talk to the DT SM-DP+, with root certificates provided by DT. An incomplete TLS chain or an outdated cipher suite is a recurring rejection cause, and the root cause is often an embedded TLS stack that is no longer maintained.
APNs and IP addressing plan
Section titled “APNs and IP addressing plan”DT typically offers several APN families: public IPv4 APN, public dual-stack IPv4/v6 APN, private APN with customer VPN attach, NB-IoT-dedicated APN, LTE-M-dedicated APN, Cloud of Things APN for pre-integrated objects. APN choice affects:
- IP addressing (public, private, RFC 1918, IPv6 range);
- latency and routing (DT apex direct, or through an MVNO);
- application integration (Cloud of Things, AWS IoT Core via private link, other);
- billing (volumes, plans, tariff profiles).
Acceptance verifies that the module attaches to the target APN without falling back to a wrong default APN, negotiates the IP stack correctly (including IPv6 where required), and handles disconnects and restarts without leaking orphan PDP sessions (a classic cause of quota leakage and network-firewall blocking).
Frequent pitfalls
Section titled “Frequent pitfalls”1. Confusing DT acceptance with T-Mobile US acceptance
Section titled “1. Confusing DT acceptance with T-Mobile US acceptance”This is the strategic pitfall. A successful DT IoT dossier does not waive T-Mobile US's programme, and vice versa, even though the two operators jointly market the T-IoT offer. Any product schedule must separate these two geographies from the very start of scoping.
2. Over-trusting NB-IoT roaming
Section titled “2. Over-trusting NB-IoT roaming”Many IoT programmes assume NB-IoT roams like LTE. In 2026, that is false in most cases. Any promise of international NB-IoT coverage must be validated country by country, operator by operator, leaning on DT IoT roaming information and the NB-IoT agreements actually in place.
3. nuSIM scoped poorly on the commercial side
Section titled “3. nuSIM scoped poorly on the commercial side”Choosing nuSIM purely for BOM savings, without validating long-term commercial strategy (volume, geography, operator portability), is a frequent mistake. If reselling the product to an international customer is on the horizon, SGP.32 eUICC keeps more options open.
4. Idealised Cat-1bis
Section titled “4. Idealised Cat-1bis”Nominal Cat-1bis throughput is never reached in real conditions when the signal is moderate. A product whose use case depends on bounded latency (payment, telemedicine, industrial control) must not rest on Cat-1bis without real mobility and cell-edge testing.
5. Lab testing only
Section titled “5. Lab testing only”DT IoT acceptance covers network scenarios that lab testing does not fully reproduce, in particular inter-subsidiary roaming and real APN attach. Skipping field testing leads to failures uncovered after commercial signing.
6. eUICC without SGP.32 IPA verification
Section titled “6. eUICC without SGP.32 IPA verification”A GSMA-certified eUICC is not enough if the IPA on the device side is not SGP.32-conformant. IPA integration is as much a software-product topic as a hardware one, and SGP.22 / SGP.32 confusion remains common.
7. Confusing Cloud of Things with a network obligation
Section titled “7. Confusing Cloud of Things with a network obligation”Cloud of Things is an optional application platform. No DT IoT acceptance step requires its use. Conversely, signing for CoT does not waive network and SIM acceptance.
8. Ignoring DT programme evolutions
Section titled “8. Ignoring DT programme evolutions”Like all carrier programmes, DT IoT acceptance evolves: newly accepted bands, gradual 2G retirement per subsidiary, APN updates, nuSIM profile evolutions. A long-cycle project must plan a periodic review of the DT documentation and certified hardware catalogue.
Project sequencing and timing
Section titled “Project sequencing and timing”The recommended order for a cellular IoT product targeting DT:
- DT IoT commercial scoping: volume, countries, technologies, SIM choice (nuSIM, SGP.32 eUICC or physical), CoT or third-party platform.
- Module selection: verify the candidate module's presence in the DT certified hardware catalogue or schedule its submission. Cross-check against PTCRB (if US also in scope) and GCF.
- Hardware design: antenna tuned to European DT bands, choice of an SoC compatible with nuSIM if retained.
- Pre-validation: network testing on DE and CZ (representative sample), NB-IoT behaviour in the lab, simulated eUICC RSP or nuSIM provisioning.
- DT IoT acceptance: dossier submission, campaign in a recognised lab, firmware iterations, catalogue listing.
- Commercial activation: nuSIM SIM enrolment, APN opening, CoT integration if applicable.
- Lifecycle tracking: declaration of firmware changes affecting radio or provisioning, monitoring of DT IoT programme evolutions.
For the broader EU view on RED, see CE vs FCC EMC and EU + US dual certification. For terminology (LPA, IPA, eUICC, eSIM, IMSI, ICCID, APN, NB-IoT, Cat-M, Cat-1bis), see the spilma glossary.
See also
Section titled “See also”- NTT DoCoMo, KDDI, SoftBank, Rakuten: Japan cellular
- China Mobile, Telecom, Unicom: cellular IoT acceptance
- Telstra, Optus, TPG: cellular IoT acceptance in Australia
- AT&T Network Ready: carrier homologation, cellular IoT
- T-Mobile US: cellular IoT device certification and DICE
Sources & references
- Deutsche Telekom IoT, product portal , Deutsche Telekom iot.telekom.com/
- IoT Device Certification, DT IoT Hub documentation , Deutsche Telekom hub.iot.telekom.com/docs/device-to-cloud/general-info/iot-device-certification/
- nuSIM, integrated SIM by Deutsche Telekom , Deutsche Telekom iot.telekom.com/en/iot-connectivity/isim
- Cloud of Things, DT application IoT platform , Deutsche Telekom iot.telekom.com/en/iot-connectivity/iot-device-management
- T-Mobile and Deutsche Telekom launch T-IoT , Deutsche Telekom www.telekom.com/en/media/media-information/archive/t-mobile-and-deutsche-telekom-launch-t-iot-648228
- 2G switch-off ensures better network (30 June 2028) , Deutsche Telekom www.telekom.com/en/media/media-information/archive/more-speed-on-old-frequencies-2g-switch-off-ensures-better-network-1081866
- PTCRB Certification Program , PTCRB www.ptcrb.com/
- GCF, Global Certification Forum , GCF www.globalcertificationforum.org/
- GSMA SGP.32, eSIM IoT Technical Specification , GSMA www.gsma.com/esim/iot-esim/
- First European NB-IoT roaming trial (GSMA, DT, Vodafone) , Deutsche Telekom www.telekom.com/en/media/media-information/archive/completion-of-first-european-nb-iot-roaming-trial-526404
Frequently asked questions
- Are PTCRB and GCF enough to activate a product on Deutsche Telekom networks?
- No. GCF is the European counterpart of PTCRB for 3GPP radio conformance, and any cellular product targeted at Europe must obtain a GCF certification (or PTCRB depending on the module) before any discussion with a carrier. Deutsche Telekom (DT) then adds its own IoT device acceptance programme which verifies interoperability with DT core networks, conformance of nuSIM or eUICC provisioning, attach profiles, DT IoT APNs and intra-group roaming policies. Without this acceptance, a module can transmit but will not be listed in the DT certified hardware catalogue, and the commercial qualification of a turn-key product is compromised.
- What is the difference between nuSIM and a standard SGP.32 eUICC?
- nuSIM is the integrated SIM (iSIM) solution developed by Deutsche Telekom with its silicon partners. Instead of a discrete SIM card or a dedicated eUICC chip, the SIM application sits in a secure zone of the cellular SoC. Provisioning runs through a DT-specific channel with an encrypted profile pre-loaded at factory, without a standard SGP.22 LPA. An SGP.32 eUICC remains a dedicated chip that follows the IoT RSP model (SM-DP+, eIM, IPA). Both approaches coexist in the DT catalogue but are not interchangeable: nuSIM is a closed DT product, SGP.32 is an open GSMA standard.
- Does the DT programme cover T-Mobile US?
- Not for device certification. T-IoT has been, since 2022, the joint commercial offering of Deutsche Telekom and T-Mobile US for global enterprise IoT connectivity, but it does not merge the certification programmes. T-Mobile US, a separately listed company in which DT holds a majority stake, operates its own device acceptance programme with its own requirements (aligned with North American PTCRB, B66/B71 bands, n41, n71). A DT acceptance dossier is not automatically usable on T-Mobile US, and vice versa. Multi-market products must plan two distinct acceptance dossiers.
- Which cellular technologies are covered by DT IoT acceptance?
- The programme covers technologies currently active in the DT IoT catalogue: LTE-M (Cat-M1), NB-IoT (Cat-NB1, Cat-NB2), LTE Cat-1bis for single-antenna modules, LTE Cat-4 and above for gateways and high-throughput terminals, and 5G NR on DT commercial bands (notably n78 in C-band). 2G remains available in some markets during the retirement window (switch-off announced for 30 June 2028 in Germany) but no longer belongs in a new product. Each technology has its own acceptance test base, and a multi-tech product must be tested on each.
- How does NB-IoT roaming work across the DT footprint?
- NB-IoT roaming has long been absent from most inter-carrier agreements. Deutsche Telekom completed with Vodafone, under the GSMA Mobile IoT Initiative, the first international NB-IoT roaming trials in Europe. In practice, NB-IoT roaming availability depends on country, on the SIM/eUICC used, and on the bilateral DT agreement with the visited operator. The DT group's own network footprint (Germany plus central and south-eastern European subsidiaries) takes priority; the rest of Europe varies. An international IoT product that assumes systematic NB-IoT roaming will fail.
- How should a product choose between nuSIM, SGP.32 eUICC and physical SIM for DT?
- The choice depends on the commercial model and volume. nuSIM offers the lowest BOM cost and the best integration for single-operator products tightly bundled with DT (turn-key with a T-IoT subscription). SGP.32 eUICC keeps multi-operator portability with a GSMA standard, recommended for international, long-lifecycle products. Physical SIM remains valid for pilot markets and low volumes but is losing ground. The choice is scoped with DT based on volume, product lifetime and country count.
- Is Cloud of Things mandatory to use DT IoT connectivity?
- No. Cloud of Things (CoT) is the DT application IoT platform, historically built on Cumulocity (a vendor independent again from Software AG since early 2025). It simplifies fleet management, OTA, telemetry collection and device management. DT IoT connectivity can be used independently with any third-party platform (AWS IoT, Azure IoT Hub, proprietary platform). CoT integration is bundled in some combined packages but does not condition acceptance of a module or product on the DT cellular network.
- What are the most frequent pitfalls of DT IoT acceptance?
- Recurring ones: misconfigured nuSIM provisioning (key not aligned between factory and DT orchestrator), untested inter-subsidiary roaming scenarios (subsidiaries keep their own APN policies), underestimated Cat-1bis throughput (a single antenna penalises cell edge), NB-IoT layer tested only in the lab without real roaming verification, non-conformant SGP.32 IPA on eUICC products, and the false assumption that T-Mobile US accepts the DT dossier.