Skip to content

UKCA vs CE: which marking do you need?

Guide, EU and GB markings

Since the United Kingdom left the European Union, two regulatory markings coexist for the same electronic product: CE marking, which opens the Union and EEA market, and UKCA marking, created for Great Britain. The picture has changed a lot, and the question facing product teams is no longer mainly technical but strategic: which marking do you actually need, and in what order? This guide opens with a side-by-side decision table, then works through each axis (legal basis, scope, assessment bodies, standards, labelling, documentation), before closing with a simple rule to tell which of the two you require for your target markets.

Decision table: which marking for your market

Section titled “Decision table: which marking for your market”

The starting point of a UKCA vs CE comparison is not the list of standards but the geography of your markets. The table below answers the practical question directly.

Target marketMarking requiredThird-party assessmentLegal reference
European Union and EEACEEU notified body (if required)EU directives and regulations
Great Britain (England, Wales, Scotland)Recognised CE or UKCAUK Approved Body for UKCABritish statutory instruments
Northern Ireland, EU assessmentCE aloneEU notified bodyWindsor Framework
Northern Ireland, GB assessmentCE plus UKNIUK Approved BodyWindsor Framework
SwitzerlandCE (often sufficient)EU notified bodyEU-Switzerland bilateral agreements

Quick reading: for the majority of electronic products (EMC, radio, low voltage, machinery), a compliant CE marking is enough today for Great Britain thanks to the extended recognition announced in August 2023. UKCA only becomes mandatory for the regimes excluded from that recognition, or if you voluntarily choose the British system. To understand the British marking in detail, see the UKCA marking guide.

The core difference between CE and UKCA is not a difference in technical requirement but in legal framework. Both systems descend from the same body of law, yet their sources have diverged since 2021.

CE marking rests on a set of directives and regulations adopted at Union level and published in the Official Journal of the European Union. For electronics, the central texts are the EMC directive 2014/30/EU, the low voltage directive 2014/35/EU and, for radio products, the RED directive 2014/53/EU. These texts set essential requirements without numeric values, and delegate measurable thresholds to harmonised standards. CE marking is valid across the twenty-seven member states and in the EEA countries (Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein).

On leaving the Union, the United Kingdom transposed the directives into domestic law through statutory instruments. The Product Safety and Metrology etc. (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/696) recast the package of directives into the UKCA regime. In concrete terms, SI 2016/1091 covers EMC, SI 2016/1101 low voltage, and SI 2017/1206 radio equipment. The essential requirements reproduce almost word for word those of the original directives.

AspectCE (Union)UKCA (Great Britain)
Legal sourceEU directives and regulationsBritish statutory instruments
Reference publicationOfficial Journal of the UnionDesignated standards list (gov.uk)
TerritoryEU plus EEAGreat Britain
Surveillance authorityNational authorities of the member statesOffice for Product Safety and Standards
How requirements evolveRevision of directives at EU levelAmendment of SIs by the UK Parliament

This divergence is legal before it is technical. An identical product can comply with both regimes from the same design, but its declaration of conformity will cite different texts depending on the market.

This is the axis that has moved the most, and the one that changes everything in the decision.

The indefinite CE recognition in Great Britain

Section titled “The indefinite CE recognition in Great Britain”

The UK government announced on 1 August 2023 its intention to recognise CE marking indefinitely for eighteen regulatory regimes managed by the Department for Business and Trade. That date is the announcement only. The operative legal basis came later: the Product Safety and Metrology etc. (Amendment) Regulations 2024, in force 1 October 2024, gave the indefinite recognition legal effect, and the Product Regulation and Metrology Act 2025 has since been enacted as the wider statutory framework. Before that announcement, UKCA was due to become mandatory at a deadline repeatedly postponed. Now, for these regimes, a product carrying a valid CE marking can be placed on the Great Britain market with no additional UKCA procedure and no known end date.

The regimes covered include in particular:

  • electromagnetic compatibility,
  • radio equipment,
  • low-voltage electrical equipment,
  • machinery,
  • toys,
  • pressure equipment.

A few product families stay outside the CE recognition and therefore require UKCA for Great Britain:

  • medical devices, under the UK MDR 2002 regime,
  • construction products, under the British CPR,
  • certain rail equipment,
  • certain marine equipment.

For these categories, CE does not open the British market and UKCA is mandatory, with assessment by a UK Approved Body where the regime demands it. The current list is maintained by the Office for Product Safety and Standards.

Northern Ireland is a separate case, governed by the Windsor Framework. CE marking stays fully valid there. The UKNI marking comes into play only when a product destined for Northern Ireland has undergone a third-party assessment entrusted to a British body: in that case the product must carry the CE plus UKNI pair, never UKCA alone. When the assessment is done by an EU notified body, CE alone is sufficient.

Where the regime requires a third-party assessment, the competent body differs by marking. This point often surprises manufacturers used only to the Union system.

A notified body is designated by a member state, listed in the European Commission NANDO database, and authorised to issue certificates for CE marking. For most electronic products under EMC and low voltage, self-assessment by the manufacturer is enough and no notified body is involved. Under the RED directive, a notified body becomes necessary in certain cases, notably when no complete harmonised standard is applied.

The British equivalent is the UK Approved Body, designated by a United Kingdom authority and listed in the UKMCAB database on gov.uk. Since 1 January 2021, an EU notified body can no longer issue a UKCA certificate, and conversely a UK Approved Body cannot issue a certificate for EU CE marking. This separation explains why a product needing third-party assessment may require two distinct certificates to cover both markets.

CriterionNotified body (CE)UK Approved Body (UKCA)
Designating authorityEU member stateUnited Kingdom authority
Reference databaseNANDO (European Commission)UKMCAB (gov.uk)
Number on the markingFour-digit number after the CENumber after the UKCA
Cross-recognitionNone since 2021None since 2021

Technical standards are the pivot of both systems, and this is where the two are closest.

On the Union side, applying a harmonised standard published in the Official Journal gives a presumption of conformity with the essential requirements covered. For radio, you might cite EN 300 328 for the 2.4 GHz band and the EN 301 489 series for radio EMC. For the full mechanism, see CE harmonised standards.

On the British side, the equivalent mechanism uses designated standards published by the Department for Business and Trade. In practice that list reproduces, regime by regime, the same EN references as the Union harmonised list, sometimes with a delay of a few months. A standard such as EN 300 328 thus appears both on the Union harmonised list and on the British designated list.

Designing and testing to EN standards remains the single valid strategy for both markets. The only point to watch is timing: confirm that a matching reference appears on the British designated list at the moment you sign the UKCA declaration. The lab work itself does not double, since the measured thresholds are identical.

Once conformity is established, the formal obligations differ on three points: the marking applied, the technical file, and the declaration of conformity.

The CE logo and the UKCA logo are distinct but follow similar rules: minimum height of five millimetres, kept proportions, applied visibly and indelibly. Where a third-party assessment has taken place, the body number follows the marking (notified body after the CE, UK Approved Body after the UKCA).

The technical file is almost identical in both systems: product description, risk analysis, list of applied standards, test reports, drawings. A single file serves as the basis for both declarations, provided you adapt the normative and legal references. See Technical documentation file contents for the detail of the expected headings.

The declaration is the document that diverges most. An EU declaration cites the directives and the harmonised standards; a UKCA declaration cites the British statutory instruments and the designated standards. The technical content (identification, standards, signatory, place) stays equivalent. For the full structure on the Union side, see EU declaration of conformity.

Formal elementCEUKCA
LogoCEUKCA
Cited referencesEU directives plus harmonised standardsBritish SIs plus designated standards
Body numberNotified body (if required)UK Approved Body (if required)
Responsible personRepresentative or importer in the Union or EEAImporter or representative in the UK
File retentionTen years generallyTen years generally

For an electronic product destined for both the Union and Great Britain, the pragmatic sequence is as follows.

  1. Design and test to EN standards, which serve both regimes.
  2. Build a single technical file, complete enough to cover the common essential requirements.
  3. Check whether a third-party assessment is required. If so, identify the right body (notified body for CE, UK Approved Body for UKCA).
  4. Check the CE recognition status for the relevant regime in Great Britain. If the regime is recognised, CE is enough and no UKCA step is required.
  5. Draft the EU declaration citing the directives and harmonised standards.
  6. If UKCA is needed (excluded regime or voluntary choice), draft a UKCA declaration citing the British SIs and designated standards, and apply the UKCA marking.
  7. Appoint a responsible person in each territory (representative or importer).

To frame the overall effort, see Certification getting started.

PitfallConsequenceHow to avoid it
Believing UKCA is still mandatory everywhereDoubled, needless certification costsCheck the CE recognition since August 2023 for the relevant regime
Confusing UKCA and UKNIRefused access to the Northern Ireland marketRemember: UKCA for Great Britain, CE or CE plus UKNI for Northern Ireland
Asking an EU notified body for a UKCA certificateCertificate not valid for Great BritainUse a UK Approved Body listed in UKMCAB
Forgetting the UK responsible personProduct non-compliant at market placementAppoint a UK importer or representative from the start
Citing EU directives in a UKCA declarationInvalid declarationCite the British statutory instruments and designated standards
Assuming a designated standard matches the harmonised oneMissing reference at signatureCheck the British designated list on the declaration date

The decision rule fits in a few lines.

  • You target only the European Union and the EEA: only CE marking is required.
  • You target the Union and Great Britain, and your product falls under a recognised regime (EMC, radio, low voltage, machinery): CE marking is enough for both markets since August 2023, UKCA is optional.
  • You target Great Britain for an excluded regime (medical devices, construction products): UKCA marking is mandatory, with a UK Approved Body if a third-party assessment is required.
  • You sell in Northern Ireland: use CE if the assessment is done by an EU body, or the CE plus UKNI pair if it is entrusted to a British body.

In every case, design and testing to EN standards remain the common foundation. The UKCA vs CE decision therefore turns mostly on regulatory scope and geography, not on the technology.

Sources & references

  1. Using the UKCA marking , gov.uk (Office for Product Safety and Standards) www.gov.uk/guidance/using-the-ukca-marking
  2. Government extends recognition of EU product rules to help businesses (1 August 2023) , Department for Business and Trade www.gov.uk/government/news/government-extends-recognition-of-eu-product-rules-to-help-businesses
  3. UK Market Conformity Assessment Bodies (UKMCAB) database , gov.uk www.gov.uk/uk-market-conformity-assessment-bodies
  4. The Windsor Framework , gov.uk www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-windsor-framework
  5. The Product Safety and Metrology etc. (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/696) , legislation.gov.uk www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2019/696/contents/made
  6. The Product Safety and Metrology etc. (Amendment) Regulations 2024 (SI 2024/696) , legislation.gov.uk www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2024/696/contents/made
  7. Product Regulation and Metrology Act 2025 , legislation.gov.uk www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2025/13/contents
  8. CE marking: Blue Guide on the implementation of EU product rules , EUR-Lex eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2022:247:TOC
  9. Placing manufactured goods on the market in Northern Ireland , gov.uk www.gov.uk/guidance/placing-manufactured-goods-on-the-market-in-northern-ireland