- All guides
- FCC ID, Grantee Code & TCB: equipment authorization
FCC ID, Grantee Code & TCB: equipment authorization
An FCC ID is not a product number the manufacturer invents. It is two elements in a fixed order, a Grantee Code the FCC assigns once per company and a product code of 14 characters at most, and it only becomes valid when a TCB publishes a grant of certification. This page reads the sections of 47 CFR Part 2 Subpart J and Part 15 that build that identifier, the role of the TCB, the label, modular approval and permissive changes, with the changes made by the 2023 to 2026 Covered List and TCB integrity orders.
Two procedures, one rulebook
Section titled “Two procedures, one rulebook”The rules live in 47 CFR Part 2 Subpart J. For the devices this page covers, Subpart J offers two procedures:
- SDoC (Supplier's Declaration of Conformity, 2.906): the responsible party makes the measurements and keeps the records. Nothing is filed with the FCC unless a sample or data is requested under 2.945.
- Certification (2.907): a grant "approved by the Commission or issued by a Telecommunication Certification Body (TCB)", based on the test data the applicant submits. It attaches to every unit marketed by the grantee that is identical to the sample tested, except for permissive changes under 2.1043.
The route is set by the rule part, not chosen freely, which is the US counterpart of the split discussed in self-declaration vs Notified Body. 2.906(c) lets any SDoC device be certified instead, and since FCC 22-84 equipment produced by an entity on the Covered List can only use Certification (2.906(d), 2.907(c)).
Unintentional, intentional and incidental radiators
Section titled “Unintentional, intentional and incidental radiators”| Device class (47 CFR 15.3) | Definition | Procedure | Typical examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unintentional radiator | Generates RF energy for use inside the device, or sends it by conduction over wiring, but is not intended to emit by radiation or induction | Mostly SDoC or Certification at the choice of the responsible party (15.101) | Computers, peripherals, power supplies, receivers |
| Intentional radiator | Intentionally generates and emits RF energy by radiation or induction | Certification (15.201(b)), with a few SDoC exceptions in 15.201(a) | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, sub-GHz, UWB transmitters |
| Incidental radiator | Generates RF energy during operation although not designed to | No authorization; good engineering practice (15.13) | DC motors, mechanical light switches |
A connected product usually holds a radio and a digital device. The radio needs Certification. The digital part is only exempt from the digital device rules when its circuitry is "used only to enable operation" of the radio (15.3(k)); otherwise it needs its own Part 15 Subpart B authorization. 2.925(b) allows a device subject to more than one procedure to carry a single FCC ID. FCC scope maps these boundaries section by section, and the FCC procedure covers the full route.
What SDoC requires
Section titled “What SDoC requires”| Requirement | Section | What the text says |
|---|---|---|
| Responsible party | 2.909(b) | Located in the United States: the manufacturer or assembler, or the importer for imported equipment |
| Test lab | 2.906(a)(1), 2.948 | No accreditation required for SDoC, unlike Certification (2.948(a)); since FCC 25-27, testing may not be done in a lab owned, controlled or directed by a prohibited entity |
| Identification | 2.1074 | A unique identification chosen by the responsible party, in a format that cannot be confused with an FCC ID; the SDoC logo is voluntary |
| Compliance information | 2.1077 | Supplied with the product: product identification, compliance statement, and the name, address and telephone or internet contact of the US responsible party |
| Label statement | 15.19(a) | The Part 15 compliance statement, which applies to SDoC and certified devices alike |
| Records and samples | 2.938, 2.945 | Records and samples supplied on request, within 21 days |
Identity: FRN, Grantee Code, FCC ID
Section titled “Identity: FRN, Grantee Code, FCC ID”Step 1, the FRN
Section titled “Step 1, the FRN”The FRN (FCC Registration Number) is "a 10-digit unique identifying number" assigned to entities doing business with the Commission, obtained through CORES (47 CFR 1.8001). Registration asks for the entity name, contact, address, email and taxpayer identifying number, to be updated within 10 business days of any change (1.8002(b)). The FRN is not specific to equipment authorization.
Step 2, the Grantee Code
Section titled “Step 2, the Grantee Code”The Grantee Code is requested electronically through the Equipment Authorization System, at any time before the first application (2.926(c)). What the texts fix:
| Point | Text | What it says |
|---|---|---|
| Format | 2.926(c) | Specified by the Office of Engineering and Technology, not by the rule itself |
| Five-character codes | DA 13-669 | Issued since 1 May 2013: a digit from 2 to 9, then four capital letters or digits from 2 to 9 |
| Three-character codes | DA 13-669, April 2013 TCB workshop | No longer issued; codes already issued and paid for remain usable; they start with a letter |
| Fee | 2.926(c), 1.1103 | Must be paid and validated within 30 days of issuance, or the code is removed and a new one must be obtained |
| Permanence | 2.926(b), (c)(1) | Assigned permanently, valid only for the party named in the assignment, reused for every later application |
| Name or ownership change | 2.926(c)(1), 2.929 | Reported to the FCC so that a new code can be assigned "if appropriate"; name and address changes within 30 days, transactions within 60 days |
Step 3, the FCC ID
Section titled “Step 3, the FCC ID”| Element | Assigned by | Length | Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grantee Code | FCC | 3 characters (older codes) or 5 characters (since 2013) | 2.926(b), (c) |
| Equipment product code | Grantee | 1 to 14 characters: capital letters, digits, dash or hyphen | 2.926(d) |
| Full FCC ID | 17 characters at most with a 3-character code, 19 with a 5-character code | DA 13-669 |
The product code must not have been used before with the same Grantee Code, nor in an application that was denied (2.926(d)). No FCC ID may appear on marketed equipment until a grant validates it, and nobody may place it on equipment without the grantee's authorization (2.926(e)). Equipment shown at a trade show before its grant may carry a model number but not a purported FCC ID.
Two rules keep one FCC ID usable across a range. 2.924 lets the grantee market electrically identical devices under different model numbers or trade names, "electrically identical" meaning no change or only Class I permissive changes. 2.929(b) lets the grantee license a second party to manufacture under the same FCC ID, with the grantee still responsible, and the second party may not be on the Covered List. Any change of the FCC ID itself needs a new application (2.933), with an abbreviated filing when design and circuitry are unchanged.
The role of the TCB
Section titled “The role of the TCB”Since the 2015 revision of Subpart J, 2.911(a) reads: "All requests for equipment authorization shall be submitted in writing to a Telecommunication Certification Body (TCB)". The TCB sends an electronic copy with all exhibits to the FCC before grant or dismissal, and grants or dismisses through the FCC system (2.962(d)(6) and (7)). The conformity assessment bodies and accreditation guide describes the same delegated model for third parties generally.
| Point | Section | What the text says |
|---|---|---|
| Accreditation | 2.960(a)(4), (6) | ISO/IEC 17065 for the scope of equipment certified, and ISO/IEC 17025 for testing competence |
| Reassessment | 2.960(a)(7)(ii) | Assessed for accreditation at intervals not exceeding two years |
| Designation | 2.960(c), (d) | In the United States, by NIST under NVCASE; outside, under an MRA to which the United States is a party |
| Ownership | 2.960(b), (h) | No recognition if a prohibited entity holds 10% or more of equity or votes; FCC 25-27 adds a duty to report interests of 5% or more, but that paragraph (2.962(d)(9)) and its lab and accreditation-body equivalents are still delayed: 91 FR 27843 excludes them from the June 15, 2026 effective date pending a separate notice (see our FCC 26-28 note) |
| Review | 2.962(a)(2), (b), (d)(2) | Typically one unmodified sample per product type; review and certification decision are never outsourced; test data from any FCC-recognized lab accepted without needless repeat testing |
| Set-aside | 2.962(f) | Within 30 days of grant, the TCB or the FCC may set aside a non-compliant grant; after that, only the FCC can revoke (2.939) |
| Limits | 2.962(g) | A TCB may not grant waivers, take enforcement action or authorize a transfer of control |
| Post-market surveillance | 2.962(i), 2.945(b)(2) | Type testing of a share of certified products; samples requested from the grantee or bought on the market |
| PAG list | 2.964 | For categories on the Pre-approval Guidance list, the TCB asks the FCC for guidance and needs its concurrence before granting |
The FCC publishes the PAG list (2.964(a)); the OET Knowledge Database (KDB) holds the advisory measurement guidance referred to in 2.947(a)(3). Since FCC 26-28 (effective 15 June 2026), 2.964(a) adds that the PAG list prioritizes equipment tested in Trusted Test Labs, meaning labs in the United States or in an economy that grants reciprocal treatment through a trade agreement.
Testing for Certification is done by a lab that is accredited and recognized by the FCC (2.948(a)). The TCB may test itself or use external labs, but stays responsible for the evaluation (2.962(c)).
What the applicant signs
Section titled “What the applicant signs”| Statement | Section | Since |
|---|---|---|
| Truth of all statements, Anti-Drug Abuse Act certification | 2.911(d)(1), (2) | Before 2023 |
| Equipment not prohibited under 2.903, and whether the applicant is on the Covered List, renewed if the list changes before grant | 2.911(d)(5), (6) | FCC 22-84, 6 February 2023 |
| A US agent for service of process, maintained for at least one year after marketing and importation end or after any related FCC proceeding ends, whichever is later; a US applicant may designate itself | 2.911(d)(7) | FCC 22-84, 6 February 2023 |
These statements also accompany every permissive change (2.932(e)) and every name, address or ownership notice (2.929(c), (d)).
The equipment authorization database
Section titled “The equipment authorization database”A grant shows its effective date and any special conditions (2.915(b)). It takes effect from its publication on the FCC website, which keeps the official copy (2.915(d)), and it identifies the approving TCB and the Commission as issuing authority (2.915(e)). Applications are not public before that date, which the applicant can ask to defer; afterwards the application and related materials, including technical specifications and test measurements, are open to inspection (0.457(d)(1)(ii)), except material given confidential treatment, which the TCB requests with the filing (2.962(d)(6)).
For an integrator, the grant and its published exhibits are the documents to read before choosing a module, because the special conditions printed on the grant bind every host that relies on it. A module approved only with a specific antenna, or only as a limited modular approval, narrows the host design before layout starts.
Labeling rules
Section titled “Labeling rules”| Rule | Section | What the text says |
|---|---|---|
| Content | 2.925(a)(1) | The FCC ID, preceded by "FCC ID" in capital letters on a single line, legible without magnification |
| Permanent and visible | 2.925(d) | Etched, engraved, stamped, indelibly printed, or a nameplate that cannot be readily detached; visible from outside the enclosure |
| Type size | 2.925(f) | Need not exceed eight-point |
| Very small device | 2.925(f), 15.19(a)(5) | If a four-point font is impractical and there is no display: in the user manual, plus either on the packaging or on a removable label |
| Several sections | 2.925(b)(1) | Separate FCC IDs allowed for separate boards with independent frequency control, marked TX FCC ID and RX FCC ID |
| Validity | 2.927(a) | A grant is valid only when the device is labeled per 2.925 |
| Part 15 statement | 15.19(a)(3) | "This device complies with part 15 of the FCC Rules..." on certified and SDoC devices |
Electronic labeling (2.935)
Section titled “Electronic labeling (2.935)”| Condition | Paragraph |
|---|---|
| Device with an integrated display, or one that can only operate with a device that has one | (a) |
| Instructions on how to access the information, in the manual, packaging inserts or a website named on the packaging | (b) |
| No special codes, accessories or permissions; no more than three steps from the settings menu | (c) |
| Programmed by the responsible party and secured against modification by third parties | (e) |
| The device or its packaging still carries the FCC ID or other information that identifies it at importation and sale | (f) |
From 1 March 2027 or 1 June 2027 depending on their role, online marketplaces must also display the FCC ID at the point of sale under FCC 26-50 (see FCC scope and FCC 26-50 in force).
Modular approval (15.212)
Section titled “Modular approval (15.212)”15.212(a) defines two kinds of modular transmitter, both approved with an antenna.
| Requirement, 15.212(a)(1) | Single modular | Split modular, (a)(2) |
|---|---|---|
| (i) Own shielding of the radio elements | Yes | Radio front end only |
| (ii) Buffered modulation and data inputs | Yes | Yes |
| (iii) Own power supply regulation | Yes | Yes |
| (iv) Antenna rules of 15.203 and 15.204; permanently attached antenna or unique coupler | Yes | Yes |
| (v) Tested stand-alone | Yes | No: tested in a representative host |
| (vi) Own FCC ID label, or electronic display of the FCC ID | Yes | Yes |
| (vii) Specific operating rules met, with instructions for the integrator | Yes | Yes |
| (viii) RF exposure statement, compliance in the final configuration | Yes | Yes |
| Digital interface of at least 150 mV peak-to-peak; only parts approved together can operate together | Yes |
A limited modular approval (15.212(b)) may be granted for a single or split module that misses some of these requirements, if the application shows by other means that it meets Part 15 in its intended operating conditions, or where RF exposure compliance is shown only for particular product configurations. The applicant must state how control of the end product is maintained so that full compliance is always ensured.
What the host maker inherits, and what stays with it:
- Label. If the module FCC ID is not visible once installed, the host carries "Contains FCC ID: XYZMODEL1" or similar wording (15.212(a)(1)(vi)(A)); with an electronic display, "Contains FCC certified transmitter module(s)" (15.212(a)(1)(vi)(B)).
- Grant conditions. Antenna types and gains, host restrictions and the integration instructions of 15.212(a)(1)(vii). OET guidance on integration is KDB 996369.
- RF exposure. The module must comply "in its final configuration" (15.212(a)(1)(viii)), so a host that places the antenna closer to the body than the grant assumes is outside it. SAR or MPE then has to be addressed in a filing.
- Digital device. The host still needs its own Part 15 Subpart B authorization for its digital circuitry, unless that circuitry only serves the radio (15.3(k)).
- Covered List. Since FCC 25-71 (effective 26 December 2025), 2.903 bars authorization of a covered modular transmitter and of any host product that incorporates one.
Permissive changes
Section titled “Permissive changes”A change in design, circuitry or construction needs a new application, except for permissive changes (2.932(a), (b)). Changes to the frequency determining circuitry, frequency multiplication, the basic modulator or the maximum power or field strength ratings always need a new grant, except Class III software changes (2.1043(a)). Software changes that do not affect RF emissions need no filing and may be made by others than the grantee.
| Class | What 2.1043(b) says | Filing |
|---|---|---|
| Class I | Modifications that do not degrade the characteristics reported and accepted at grant | None |
| Class II | Modifications that degrade the performance characteristics reported at initial certification, the degraded performance still meeting the minimum requirements of the rules | Test results for the affected characteristics, Covered List statements, US agent details; not marketed under the grant before acknowledgement |
| Class III | Software changes to a software defined radio that move frequency range, modulation type or maximum output power outside the approved parameters, or change the circumstances of operation | Description, test results with the new software (including RF exposure), same statements; software not loaded before acknowledgement; only if no Class II change was made |
Class I and Class II changes may only be made by the grant holder (2.1043(b)(4)); for equipment outside Parts 15 and 18, another party may supply the Class II data (2.1043(f)). None of the classes may change the FCC ID. From 13 October 2026, FCC 26-50 requires a new grant for any change made by a Covered List entity. The Class II permissive change guide reads 2.1043 paragraph by paragraph and compares it with ISED and the RED.
Dated changes to the identifier and the TCB rules
Section titled “Dated changes to the identifier and the TCB rules”| Date | Text | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 June 2012 (adopted) | Order, 27 FCC Rcd 6565 | 2.925 and 2.926 amended to allow five-character Grantee Codes |
| 1 May 2013 | Public Notice DA 13-669 | OET starts issuing five-character codes; three-character codes no longer issued |
| 12 June 2015 | 80 FR 33439 to 33445 (amended sections) | Subpart J revised: all applications submitted to TCBs (2.911(a)), pre-approval guidance procedure (2.964), name change and modification rules rewritten |
| 2 November 2017 | 82 FR 50825 and following | SDoC replaces the former verification and Declaration of Conformity procedures; electronic labeling rule 2.935 |
| 6 February 2023 | FCC 22-84, 88 FR 7592 | Covered equipment barred; Covered List attestations and US agent for service of process for every applicant |
| 8 September 2025 | FCC 25-27, 90 FR 38045 | TCBs, labs and accreditation bodies owned, controlled or directed by a prohibited entity lose recognition; SDoC testing barred in such labs; some provisions delayed indefinitely |
| 26 December 2025 | FCC 25-71, 90 FR 53227 | Covered modular transmitters and hosts that incorporate them barred; prohibition extended to changes |
| 15 June 2026 | FCC 26-28, 91 FR 27843 | Trusted Test Lab priority on the PAG list; post-market surveillance updates; some provisions delayed |
| 13 October 2026 | FCC 26-50, 91 FR 57798 | Logic-bearing components from Covered List entities; full certification for any change by such an entity; marketing rules reach online marketplaces |
| 1 March 2027 and 1 June 2027 | FCC 26-50 | Online marketplaces display the FCC ID at the point of sale |
Claims the texts contradict
Section titled “Claims the texts contradict”| Common claim | What the text says |
|---|---|
| A Class II change is one that "affects compliance but stays within the same basic design" (this page said so until October 2026) | 2.1043(b)(2): a Class II change degrades the performance characteristics reported at grant while still meeting the rules. Changes to the basic frequency or modulator circuitry or the power rating need a new grant whatever the design (2.1043(a)) |
| Grantee Codes "never contain 0 or 1" | DA 13-669 excludes 0 and 1 from five-character codes only. It says nothing about the characters of older three-character codes |
| The FCC ID is 14 characters at most | 14 is the limit for the product code (2.926(d)); a full FCC ID can reach 17 or 19 characters (DA 13-669) |
| Hyphens in the product code must not be consecutive | 2.926(d) allows capital letters, digits and the dash or hyphen, with no such condition |
| Only SDoC needs a party in the United States | Every Certification applicant designates a US agent for service of process (2.911(d)(7)), since 6 February 2023 |
| The radio drives the procedure and the digital part is covered by the same certification | The digital part needs its own Part 15 Subpart B authorization unless its circuitry only enables the radio (15.3(k)); 2.925(b) only allows one FCC ID for both |
| Unintentional radiators use SDoC | 15.101 lists SDoC or Certification for most of them, and scanning receivers need Certification; Covered List producers must certify (2.907(c)) |
| A small device may put its FCC ID on the packaging and manual | Only below a four-point font with no display, and then in the manual plus either the packaging or a removable label (2.925(f)) |
| SDoC devices carry no label statement | 15.19(a) applies to SDoC and certified devices alike; 2.1074 also requires a unique identification |
| Certification testing must be at an ISO/IEC 17025 lab, SDoC "where the rules call for it" | Certification labs must be accredited and FCC-recognized (2.948(a)); SDoC has no accreditation requirement, only the prohibited-entity bar (2.906(a)(1)) |
| A Grantee Code is permanent as soon as it is issued | The fee must be validated within 30 days or the code is removed (2.926(c)) |
| The public database always shows schematics and block diagrams | Materials given confidential treatment are withheld (0.457, 2.962(d)(6)) |
Relationship with ISED Canada
Section titled “Relationship with ISED Canada”ISED certifies radio apparatus under RSP-100 and issues its own certification number, shown with the "IC:" prefix. Under the Canada-US mutual recognition arrangement, laboratories and certification bodies designated on one side can be recognised on the other; on the FCC side, 2.960(d) recognises TCBs outside the United States only when designated under an MRA, and not if the partner economy refuses US TCBs. One test campaign can therefore feed both files, but the Canadian file must show compliance with the RSS standards, and the two grants stay separate applications with separate identifiers. The ISED Canada radio certification guide covers the Canadian side.
A practical sequence
Section titled “A practical sequence”- Classify the device under 15.3 and the rule part, and check whether its digital part needs its own authorization.
- Register an FRN in CORES, then request a Grantee Code and pay the fee within 30 days.
- Choose a product code of 14 characters at most, not used before with your Grantee Code.
- Test at an accredited, FCC-recognized lab, after reading the relevant KDB guidance and checking whether the device is on the PAG list.
- Designate a US agent for service of process and sign the 2.911(d) statements.
- File with a TCB, with any confidentiality request; the grant takes effect when published.
- Label under 2.925, 2.935 and 15.19, and keep the SDoC material for any part authorized that way.
- Plan changes under 2.1043 and notify name, address or ownership changes under 2.929.
See also
Section titled “See also”- FCC scope: which devices need authorization
- FCC permissive changes: Class I, II, III and RED delta
- Conformity assessment bodies and accreditation
- EMC Directive 2014/30/EU: a guide
- NRTL / UL listing: US product safety explained
- Radio spectrum: SRD and license-free bands
- Substantial modification: when to re-certify in the EU
Sources & references
- 47 CFR Part 2, Subpart J, Equipment Authorization Procedures (eCFR), eCFR www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-2/subpart-J
- 47 CFR 15.212, Modular transmitters (eCFR), eCFR www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-15/subpart-C/section-15.212
- 47 CFR 15.19, Labeling requirements (eCFR), eCFR www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-15/subpart-A/section-15.19
- 47 CFR Part 1, Subpart W, FCC Registration Number (eCFR), eCFR www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-1/subpart-W
- 47 CFR 0.457, Records not routinely available for public inspection (eCFR), eCFR www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/chapter-I/subchapter-A/part-0/subpart-C/section-0.457
- Public Notice DA 13-669 (April 9, 2013): OET to begin issuing five-character Grantee Codes, FCC docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-13-669A1_Rcd.pdf
- TCB Workshop, April 2013: EAS and Grantee Code update (slides), FCC Office of Engineering and Technology transition.fcc.gov/bureaus/oet/ea/presentations/files/apr13/3b-EAS_Grantee-Update_v3-GT.pdf
- FCC 22-84, Report and Order, 88 FR 7592 (February 6, 2023), Federal Register www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/02/06/2022-28263/protecting-against-national-security-threats-to-the-communications-supply-chain-through-the
- FCC 25-27, TCB and test lab integrity Report and Order, 90 FR 38045 (August 7, 2025), Federal Register www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/07/2025-14970/promoting-the-integrity-and-security-of-telecommunications-certification-bodies-measurement
- FCC 26-28, Trusted Test Lab fast track and post-market surveillance, 91 FR 27843 (May 15, 2026), Federal Register www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/05/15/2026-09822/promoting-the-integrity-and-security-of-telecommunications-certification-bodies-measurement
- FCC 26-50, Third Report and Order, 91 FR 57798 (September 11, 2026), Federal Register www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/09/11/2026-18535/protecting-against-national-security-threats-to-the-communications-supply-chain-through-the
- RSP-100, issue 12: Certification of Radio Apparatus and Broadcasting Equipment, ISED Canada ised-isde.canada.ca/site/spectrum-management-telecommunications/en/devices-and-equipment/radio-standards-procedures-rsp/rsp-100-certification-radio-apparatus-and-broadcasting-equipment
- OET Knowledge Database (KDB), FCC Office of Engineering and Technology apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/kdb/index.cfm
- FCC ID Search (Equipment Authorization System), FCC www.fcc.gov/oet/ea/fccid
Frequently asked questions
- What is the difference between SDoC and Certification under FCC rules?
- They are the two equipment authorization procedures of 47 CFR Part 2 Subpart J. Under SDoC (2.906) the responsible party, which must be located in the United States, tests the product and files nothing with the FCC unless a sample is requested under 2.945. Certification (2.907) is a grant issued by a TCB on the test data the applicant submits, and it is the grant that validates an FCC ID. The rule part decides the route: intentional radiators need Certification (15.201(b)), while most unintentional radiators may use SDoC or Certification (15.101).
- How do I get a Grantee Code?
- You first need an FRN, the 10-digit FCC Registration Number obtained through CORES (47 CFR 1.8001). You then request the Grantee Code electronically through the Equipment Authorization System (2.926(c)). The fee under 1.1103 must be paid and validated within 30 days of issuance, or the code is removed from the records and a new one must be obtained. Since 1 May 2013 the FCC issues five-character codes: a digit from 2 to 9 followed by four capital letters or digits from 2 to 9 (Public Notice DA 13-669). Older three-character codes remain valid.
- What does an FCC ID actually consist of?
- Two elements in a fixed order (2.926(a)): the Grantee Code assigned by the FCC, then the equipment product code chosen by the grantee. The product code uses capital letters, digits and the dash or hyphen, totals 14 characters at most, and must not have been used before with the same Grantee Code (2.926(d)). An FCC ID is therefore 17 characters at most with a three-character Grantee Code and 19 with a five-character one. On the label it is preceded by the words FCC ID (2.925(a)(1)).
- Do I need a TCB, or can I deal with the FCC directly?
- All requests for equipment authorization are submitted to a TCB (2.911(a)), and the TCB sends the application to the FCC electronically and grants or dismisses it through the FCC system (2.962(d)). For equipment on the Pre-approval Guidance list, the TCB must first ask the FCC for guidance and obtain its concurrence (2.964). SDoC involves no TCB and no grant.
- What is the difference between modular and limited modular approval?
- Under 15.212(a), a single modular transmitter gets modular approval when it has its own shielding, buffered modulation and data inputs, its own power supply regulation, a permanently attached antenna or unique coupler, stand-alone testing, its own FCC ID label or electronic display, integration instructions and an RF exposure statement. A split modular transmitter meets most of the same conditions plus a 150 mV digital interface and paired-component checks. Under 15.212(b), a limited modular approval covers modules that miss some of these conditions, or whose RF exposure compliance is shown only for particular host configurations; the applicant must state how control of the end product is maintained.
- Does an FCC ID transfer to ISED Canada automatically?
- No. ISED issues its own certification number under RSP-100. Under the Canada-US mutual recognition arrangement, test laboratories and certification bodies designated on one side can be recognised by the other, and 2.960(d) lets the FCC recognise TCBs outside the United States designated under an MRA. One test campaign can therefore feed both files, but they remain two applications and two identifiers.
- Where can I check whether a module is genuinely certified?
- In the FCC Equipment Authorization System search. A grant is effective from its publication on the FCC website, which holds the official copy and shows any special conditions (2.915(b) and (d)). Once the authorization is effective, the application and related materials, including test data, are available for inspection (0.457(d)(1)(ii)), except material given confidential treatment at the applicant's request.