Skip to content

USB-IF: USB-C, USB4 and USB Power Delivery certification

Guide - USB-IF certification

The USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF) is the consortium that maintains the USB specifications and operates the associated certification programme. Unlike a regulatory authority, USB-IF is a private not-for-profit association whose decisions take their force from a contractual trademark licensing regime and from an ecosystem of accredited laboratories. The programme covers the entire USB-connected peripheral: USB-C connectors, cables, USB Power Delivery chargers, USB4 controllers, USB 2.0 and USB 3.x peripherals. The European Directive (EU) 2022/2380 has recently established the USB-C port as the wired charging port for most portable devices sold in the Union, referring to specifications maintained by USB-IF through the EN 62680 series. This page describes the scope of the programme, the certification routes, VID and PID allocation, USB PD negotiation with EPR and PPS, alternate modes, and the relationship between private certification and EU regulatory requirements.

The USB Implementers Forum was founded in 1995 by a group of companies (Compaq, DEC, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, NEC, Nortel) to drive the evolution of the universal serial bus. It is today a non-profit corporation based in Beaverton, Oregon. USB-IF is neither a public authority nor a Notified Body in the European sense; it operates as a private consortium, on a model close to the Bluetooth SIG or PCI-SIG.

Its scope covers:

  • publishing and maintaining the USB specifications (USB 2.0, USB 3.2, USB4, USB Power Delivery, USB Type-C, USB Authentication);
  • allocating USB industrial identifiers, primarily the Vendor ID;
  • licensing the USB trademarks (words and logos) to member companies;
  • the compliance programme (Compliance Program), with accreditation of a network of laboratories (Authorized Compliance Labs);
  • the Integrators List, the public database of products that have passed compliance testing.

USB-IF imposes no regulatory placing-on-the-market obligation: commercialising a USB-equipped product in the EU or the US depends on national regimes (CE marking in the EU, FCC in the US). But without USB-IF certification, a product cannot use the USB brand or the official logos and cannot be listed on the Integrators List; these two constraints strongly restrict OEM channels and commercial perception, particularly for chargers and cables.

Use of the USB trademarks is strictly conditioned on an active licence with USB-IF. For a manufacturer, two routes coexist:

  • Joining as a Member Company, with access to working specifications, technical support and preferential pricing on certifications and conferences;
  • Accessing via the Non-Member Logo License Agreement, which lets a non-member company use the USB logos on certified products, against a fee and the signature of a licence agreement.

All manufacturers submitting a product for certification must obtain a VID beforehand, whether they are members or not. The exact amount of the administrative VID assignment fee is published by USB-IF and is reviewed periodically; the official site is the authoritative reference for the current figure.

Identification of a USB peripheral on the bus relies on the (VID, PID, bcdDevice) triplet declared in the Device Descriptor during enumeration.

The Vendor ID is a 16-bit integer uniquely assigned by USB-IF to a company. It identifies the manufacturer to the host system and, on certain operating systems, conditions automatic loading of signed drivers. Assignment goes through an administrative application on the USB-IF portal, with a one-time payment. USB-IF does not reallocate released VIDs: a VID is bound in perpetuity to the entity that obtained it.

A VID does not, in itself, grant the right to use the USB trademarks on a product. It identifies the manufacturer, nothing more. Commercial use of the logos additionally requires the trademark licence and certification of the product concerned.

The Product ID is a 16-bit integer managed by the VID holder. The manufacturer freely allocates its 65,536 PIDs to product references. No registration with USB-IF is required; the manufacturer is, however, responsible for guaranteeing internal uniqueness and keeping a registry, which is indispensable for driver maintenance and software traceability.

The VID:PID pair is universal: two commercial references sharing the same pair risk driver conflicts on host systems. A non-backwards-compatible hardware update should normally trigger a new PID.

A third field, bcdDevice, distinguishes revisions of the same product reference. It is BCD-encoded and is not allocated by USB-IF. The iSerialNumber, when present, provides a unit-unique identifier, useful for fleet management and failure analysis.

The evolution of USB data rates has produced a complex nomenclature that USB-IF has tried to rationalise several times. The table below gives the technical milestones and the currently recommended official marketing name.

SpecificationYear publishedNominal rateCurrent marketing nameTypical connector
USB 1.1199812 Mbps (Full Speed)Historical Hi-SpeedType-A, Type-B
USB 2.02000480 Mbps (High Speed)USB 2.0Type-A, Type-B, micro-B, Type-C
USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen 1 / 3.2 Gen 120085 Gbps (SuperSpeed)USB 5GbpsBlue Type-A, Type-C
USB 3.1 Gen 2 / 3.2 Gen 2201310 Gbps (SuperSpeed+)USB 10GbpsType-A, Type-C
USB 3.2 Gen 2x2201720 GbpsUSB 20GbpsType-C only
USB4 1.0 (USB4 Gen 2x2 / Gen 3x2)201920 Gbps / 40 GbpsUSB 20Gbps / USB 40GbpsType-C only
USB4 Version 2.0202280 Gbps, asymmetric up to 120 GbpsUSB 80GbpsType-C only

USB4 is technically distinct from USB 3.x: it takes the Thunderbolt physical layer and introduces the concept of tunneling, in which a single cable carries encapsulated USB 3.x, DisplayPort and PCIe streams. Backwards compatibility with USB 3.x and USB 2.0 is preserved by initial negotiation.

Certification is granted by specification: a product declared compliant with USB 80Gbps must pass USB4 v2 testing; it does not automatically inherit the USB 40Gbps label, even if the silicon technically supports it.

The USB Type-C connector, published in 2014, introduces reversibility (insertion in either orientation), electrical symmetry and a Configuration Channel (CC) signalling bus that drives role negotiation (DFP / UFP, source / sink, host / device) and power.

The CC1 / CC2 pair carries several functions:

  • mechanical detection of insertion orientation;
  • identification of the partner via pull-ups / pull-downs;
  • transport of the USB PD protocol at BMC (Biphase Mark Coding) layer;
  • optional transport of Vconn to power the cable e-marker.

The source-side pull-up resistors (Rp) determine the default current advertised before PD negotiation (USB Default 500 mA / 900 mA, 1.5 A, 3 A). Any non-conformity of the Rp / Rd values, common in rushed designs, leads to enumeration problems and certification failures.

Any USB Type-C cable carrying more than 3 A must embed an e-marker, a microcontroller running USB PD that responds to Discover Identity requests and declares the cable capabilities:

  • maximum supported current (3 A, 5 A, EPR up to 5 A at 48 V);
  • maximum physical-layer rate (USB 2.0 only, USB 3.2 Gen 1 / 2, USB4 Gen 2 / 3);
  • EPR support;
  • alternate-mode support (DisplayPort, Thunderbolt);
  • VID:PID of the cable manufacturer.

A cable with no e-marker, or with an invalid e-marker, is limited by the charger to 3 A (60 W at 20 V) at best, or refused for EPR profiles. The absence of an e-marker on a cable advertised at 100 W or more is one of the most frequent reasons for marketplace removal and compliance failure.

USB Power Delivery (USB PD) is the protocol layer that manages power negotiation over the USB-C bus. It has evolved across several major revisions, with the following key additions.

RevisionYearMain additionMax powerFixed voltages
PD 1.02012Type-A / Type-B connector, BFSK on Vbus100 W (5 A / 20 V)5, 12, 20 V
PD 2.02014Type-C, BMC on CC, alternate modes100 W5, 9, 15, 20 V
PD 3.02017Authentication, PPS, Fast Role Swap100 W5, 9, 15, 20 V
PD 3.12021EPR (Extended Power Range), AVS240 WSPR: 5, 9, 15, 20 V; EPR: 28, 36, 48 V
PD 3.22024EPR clarifications, USB4 v2 alignment240 WSame as 3.1

The Extended Power Range introduces three fixed voltage steps above 20 V: 28 V (up to 140 W), 36 V (up to 180 W) and 48 V (up to 240 W), all at 5 A. An EPR product must first respect the Standard Power Range baseline (SPR, up to 100 W), then declare the supported EPR steps. EPR cables must be identified as EPR-capable through their e-marker.

PPS is an optional mode introduced in PD 3.0 that allows a continuously adjustable voltage in 20 mV steps and a current in 50 mA steps, within a range declared by the charger. An APDO (Augmented Power Data Object) declares the range (for example 3.3 V - 11 V, 0 - 5 A), and the peripheral requests an operating point through a Request Data Object. PPS is used for fast battery charging in closed loop, where the peripheral reports SoC and temperature to adjust the voltage in real time.

PPS is required for some USB-IF certified charger logos (Certified USB Charger, Certified USB Fast Charger).

PD negotiation follows a strict sequence: CC detection, attachment, Source_Capabilities exchange (PDO table), Request, Accept or Reject, PS_RDY. A Power Role Swap is possible after negotiation, turning a sink into a source (typical case of a USB-C dock that draws power then supplies peripherals).

Any non-conformity to the sequence or to the timings, common in partial implementations, leads to compliance failures. Strict respect of the state machines described in the USB PD Specification is one of the most delicate aspects of the programme.

The USB-C connector carries not only USB data and PD power, but also, in alternate mode, other native protocols encapsulated over the SuperSpeed pairs. Negotiation is carried by USB PD through VDM (Vendor Defined Messages) Discover Modes / Enter Mode.

Alternate modeSpecificationRate / capabilityNotes
DisplayPort Alt ModeVESA DisplayPort Alt Mode 1.0 / 2.0 / 2.1DP 1.4 / 2.0 / 2.1 (up to UHBR20, 80 Gbps)Shares the SS pairs, 2 or 4 lanes
Thunderbolt 3 / 4 / 5Intel Thunderbolt Specification40 / 40 / 80 Gbps (TB5 up to 120 Gbps asymmetric)Additional Intel TB certification
HDMI Alt ModeHDMI Forum (deprecated)HDMI 1.4bNearly extinct in favour of DisplayPort Alt Mode
MHL Alt ModeMHL Consortium (deprecated)MHL 3.xNearly extinct
USB4 (not alt mode)USB4 v1 / v220 / 40 / 80 GbpsNative tunneling of DP, PCIe, USB 3.x

With USB4, tunneling makes alternate modes partly redundant: a USB4 cable natively carries DisplayPort and USB 3.x without mode switching. But non-USB4 USB-C peripherals, particularly displays in DisplayPort Alt Mode, remain widely deployed. USB4 certification of a product does not cover use of a DisplayPort alternate mode on another port; each mode is evaluated separately.

USB-IF operates a compliance programme structured around accredited laboratories and integration events.

Around twenty laboratories worldwide are accredited by USB-IF to run the Compliance Tests. The list is public on the USB-IF site. Accreditation is specific to covered specifications (a laboratory may be authorised for USB 2.0, USB 3.2 and USB PD but not for USB4, for example).

Testing covers:

  • the electrical layer (eye diagrams on SuperSpeed, RX mask, jitter, return loss, CC pull-ups, Vbus regulation, inrush current);
  • the protocol layer (enumeration, descriptors, conformance to USB and PD state machines);
  • PD negotiation (Source / Sink Capabilities, SPR and EPR steps, PPS if declared, Fast Role Swap if declared);
  • Type-C conformance (orientation, polarity, attach / detach, debounce timings);
  • interoperability with a Gold Tree (set of reference host / peripheral / charger products).

The Gold Tree is a key point: a product passing electrical tests but failing an interoperability test against a reference product is rejected, even when its behaviour matches the letter of the specified states.

USB-IF organises several USB Compliance Workshops per year, semi-private events where manufacturers can present their products to the official labs on site, benefit from preferential pricing and correct gaps between sessions. It is a preferred route for products in development, complementary to testing at an external laboratory.

Products that have passed the tests are published on the Integrators List, the USB-IF public database, with their TID (Test ID), VID, list of certified specifications and certification date. It is this list, rather than a paper certificate, that is authoritative for use of the trademarks.

Directive (EU) 2022/2380 on the common charger, in force since 28 December 2024 and extended to laptops on 28 April 2026, inserts in RED Directive 2014/53/EU an article 3.4 that imposes technical requirements on the wired charging port of most portable devices.

Article 3.4 does not name USB-IF and does not require a certified logo. It imposes, in substance:

  • the presence of a USB Type-C port on portable wired-charging devices;
  • USB Power Delivery compatibility above 15 W input power, without a restrictive proprietary handshake;
  • unbundled sale of the charger (with or without, at the consumer's choice);
  • a harmonised label indicating whether a charger is included in the box and the minimum / maximum supported power.

The technical reference goes through the EN 62680 series, the CENELEC transposition of USB-IF specifications:

  • EN IEC 62680-1-3: Common components, USB Type-C cable and connector;
  • EN IEC 62680-1-2: USB Power Delivery;
  • EN IEC 62680-1: Universal Serial Bus interfaces, general.

A product compliant with the corresponding USB-IF specifications meets the technical requirement of article 3.4 without it being a regulatory requirement to hold a USB-IF certificate. In practice, however, without going through Compliance Testing, demonstrating compliance with PD negotiation and the USB-C baseline is extremely difficult to document in a RED file.

USB-IF certification versus regulatory compliance

Section titled “USB-IF certification versus regulatory compliance”

The table below summarises the difference in nature.

AspectUSB-IF certificationDirective (EU) 2022/2380 / RED art. 3.4 compliance
NaturePrivate consortium programmeEuropean regulatory framework
Legal actTrademark licence + listingCE marking + RED DoC
ObjectTrademark, product identity, interoperabilitySingle market access
SanctionLicence withdrawal, listing removal, trademark infringement actionProhibition of placing on the market, recall, fines
DocumentsTID, Integrators List entry, lab reportsRED DoC, technical file, harmonised label
ReferenceUSB Type-C, USB PD, USB4 (USB-IF specs)RED 2014/53/EU + EN 62680 series
Assessment bodiesAuthorized Compliance Labs (USB-IF)Self-assessment module A or Notified Body

In practice, a manufacturer wishing to place a USB-C product on the EU market while covering both regulatory compliance and use of the USB trademarks engages both programmes in parallel, ensuring that the laboratory reports cover the tests useful to both. See CE marking and RED pillar for the European regimes, and universal USB-C charger, 2024 application for the entry-into-force schedule.

The most direct and most heavily sanctioned mistake. The USB word, the official trident, the SuperSpeed logo, the USB4 and USB PD trademarks are protected. Any mention on a product, on packaging or on an online listing requires an active licence and a product listed on the Integrators List. Marketplaces (Amazon, AliExpress, eBay) regularly remove listings following USB-IF notifications.

A USB-C cable advertised above 60 W (typically 100 W via 20 V / 5 A) without a valid e-marker is not compliant with the USB Type-C Specification. It will be capped by PD chargers at 3 A and refused for EPR profiles. This is one of the most common defects on cables of dubious origin.

Many partial implementations work in interoperability with one known charger but fail against another. The cause is almost always an approximation in the PD state machines (PS_RDY timings, Hard Reset / Cable Reset transitions, ordering of Source_Capabilities). The Gold Tree exposes these gaps. PD is best treated as a communication protocol in its own right, with unit tests and an interop bench, rather than as a simple power-supply routine.

USB 3.x / USB4 confusion based on the connector

Section titled “USB 3.x / USB4 confusion based on the connector”

A Type-C connector says nothing about the data rate. A Type-C product may be USB 2.0 only (480 Mbps), USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, USB 20Gbps or USB 40Gbps / 80Gbps USB4. The official USB-IF marketing nomenclature (USB 5Gbps, USB 10Gbps, etc.) must be used on documentation and packaging, and aligned with the specification actually certified.

A DisplayPort or Thunderbolt alternate mode activated without prior declaration through Discover Modes / Enter Mode VDMs is non-compliant. The mode may work in interop with one known product but will fail compliance or another host. The order of PD VDM messages is strictly specified.

Neglecting USB PD 3.0 / 3.1 in favour of a proprietary Quick Charge

Section titled “Neglecting USB PD 3.0 / 3.1 in favour of a proprietary Quick Charge”

Several chargers and phones implement proprietary protocols (QC, VOOC, SuperVOOC) on top of the standard PD. Directive (EU) 2022/2380 explicitly prohibits subordinating fast charging to a restrictive proprietary handshake above 15 W. Full USB PD charging must be available with any compliant PD charger, without artificial performance degradation in the absence of the proprietary protocol.

Some open-hardware platforms (Arduino, FTDI, MCS Electronics, OpenMoko) have historically shared their VID with their users. This practice is not compliant with USB-IF terms of use: a VID is bound to an entity, and it cannot be reused by products commercialised by third parties. A commercial product must always have its own VID.

Announcing USB4 without effective certification

Section titled “Announcing USB4 without effective certification”

USB4 v1 and v2 impose specific testing, distinct from USB 3.2. A product announced as USB4 without explicit USB4 certification, even if the silicon technically supports it, cannot carry the USB4 mark or the USB 40Gbps / USB 80Gbps logo. The presence of a capable controller is never sufficient for certification.

USB-IF certification coexists with several other regimes:

  • CE marking and the RED Directive for placing on the EU market;
  • FCC Part 15 for unintentional emissions in the US;
  • CB Scheme for electrical safety (IEC 62368-1 testing on chargers);
  • Thunderbolt Certification by Intel for TB3 / TB4 / TB5 products, in addition to USB-IF;
  • Bluetooth SIG, Matter and other consortia for application layers.

For a product commercialised on both sides of the Atlantic, see EU + US dual certification; for issues specific to the EU common charger, see universal USB-C charger, 2024 application.

See also the glossary for definitions of VID, PID, e-marker, EPR, PPS, alternate mode, and the guides CE marking, RED pillar and universal USB-C charger for the application of Directive (EU) 2022/2380.

Sources & references

  1. USB-IF, USB Implementers Forum , USB Implementers Forum www.usb.org/
  2. USB-IF Compliance Program , USB Implementers Forum www.usb.org/compliance
  3. USB-IF Document Library (USB 2.0, USB4, USB PD specifications) , USB Implementers Forum www.usb.org/document-library
  4. Directive (EU) 2022/2380, common charger , EUR-Lex eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2380/oj
  5. RED Directive 2014/53/EU, article 3.4 , EUR-Lex eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/53/oj
  6. EN 62680 series, Universal Serial Bus interfaces for data and power , CENELEC standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/clc/